Oasis Point Rehabilitation Hospital

Marketing & Sales Playbook

The 40% Rule: Expanding Rehabilitation Opportunities

This comprehensive guide will help you understand the 40% Rule, identify and document patients with diagnoses that fall outside the 60% Rule, and justify why they still qualify for IRF services based on their medical necessity and intensive rehabilitation needs.

What is the 40% Rule?

+

The 40% Rule allows for patients with non-qualifying diagnoses (i.e., those not listed under the 60% Rule) to be admitted to an IRF if their medical and rehabilitation needs meet Medicare's criteria for inpatient rehabilitation. These patients often have complex conditions or comorbidities that justify the need for intensive therapy and close medical supervision.

The 40% Rule gives IRFs flexibility to admit patients who may not fall under the predefined list of qualifying conditions but still demonstrate a clear need for IRF-level care.

Key Medicare Requirements for 40% Rule Patients

To admit patients under the 40% Rule, the following criteria must be met and documented clearly:

  1. Medical Necessity:

    The patient must require intensive rehabilitation services that cannot be safely or effectively provided in a lower level of care (e.g., SNF, home health, or outpatient therapy).

  2. Functional Deficits:

    The patient must have significant impairments in mobility, self-care, or cognitive/communication abilities that require therapy.

  3. Interdisciplinary Approach:

    The patient must require the involvement of at least two therapy disciplines (e.g., PT, OT, SLP).

  4. Rehabilitation Goals:

    Goals must be specific, measurable, and achievable within the IRF setting.

  5. Close Medical Supervision:

    The patient must require frequent physician oversight and monitoring of their condition.

Examples of Diagnoses That Qualify Under the 40% Rule

Patients with the following diagnoses may qualify under the 40% Rule, provided their documentation supports medical necessity and the need for intensive rehabilitation:

  • Post-COVID-19 Syndrome (with severe deconditioning or functional deficits)
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (with significant deconditioning)
  • Guillain-Barré Syndrome (with progressive weakness and mobility impairments)
  • Cancer and Cancer-Related Debility (e.g., post-surgery or chemotherapy with severe functional decline)
  • Cardiac Conditions (e.g., post-cardiac surgery with significant deconditioning)
  • Severe Deconditioning (e.g., after prolonged hospitalization or critical illness)
  • Chronic Pain Syndromes (e.g., fibromyalgia with functional limitations)
  • Burns (not meeting the 60% Rule threshold)

Best Practices for Documenting 40% Rule Patients

+

Since these diagnoses are not automatically recognized by Medicare under the 60% Rule, documentation must be thorough and compelling to justify their admission to an IRF.

1. Clearly Describe the Diagnosis and Functional Deficits

Detail how the patient's condition impacts their ability to perform ADLs, ambulate, or communicate.

Example: "Patient with post-COVID-19 syndrome presents with profound deconditioning, requiring max assist for transfers and dependent for all ADLs. Severe fatigue and shortness of breath impact therapy participation."

2. Demonstrate Medical Necessity for IRF Care

Explain why the patient cannot receive care in a lower-level setting.

Example: "Patient's complex medical condition, including severe cardiopulmonary compromise, requires close medical supervision and intensive rehabilitation services that cannot be safely provided in a SNF or home health setting."

3. Highlight Interdisciplinary Care

Show the need for coordination between at least two therapy disciplines.

Example: "PT will address lower extremity weakness and balance deficits to improve ambulation, while OT will focus on ADL retraining and energy conservation techniques."

4. Include Rehabilitation Goals

Specify realistic, measurable goals to demonstrate the patient's potential for improvement.

Example: "Short-term goal: Within 7 days, patient will progress from max assist to mod assist for transfers. Long-term goal: Within 14 days, patient will perform grooming tasks independently with setup assistance."

5. Emphasize Medical Oversight

Document the need for ongoing physician involvement to manage comorbidities or risks.

Example: "Patient requires daily physician oversight to monitor and adjust treatment for uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension, which may impact therapy progression."

Pre-Screen Checklist for 40% Rule Patients

+

Use this checklist to ensure your pre-screen documentation for 40% Rule patients is complete and compelling:

Patient Information

Functional Status (Must be Detailed and Specific)

Medical Necessity (Critical for 40% Rule)

Rehabilitation Plan (Must be Comprehensive)

Case Studies: 40% Rule Diagnoses

+

The following case studies illustrate how to properly document patients with non-qualifying diagnoses under the 40% Rule:

Case 1: Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

  • Patient: 62-year-old male with severe deconditioning following a prolonged ICU stay for COVID-19
  • PLOF: Independent with all ADLs and ambulation
  • Current Status: Max assist for transfers, dependent for ADLs, and non-ambulatory
  • Rehab Goals: Progress to mod assist for transfers and ambulation with a walker, and achieve independence in basic ADLs

Case 2: COPD with Deconditioning

  • Patient: 70-year-old female with advanced COPD and significant functional decline
  • PLOF: Independent with ambulation and ADLs
  • Current Status: Requires mod assist for transfers, dependent for ADLs, and demonstrates severe exertional dyspnea
  • Rehab Goals: Improve endurance and progress to supervision for ambulation and ADLs

Case 3: Guillain-Barré Syndrome

  • Patient: 35-year-old male with progressive weakness and paralysis due to Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • PLOF: Fully independent
  • Current Status: Dependent for transfers and ADLs, with severe bilateral lower extremity weakness
  • Rehab Goals: Regain strength to progress to mod assist for transfers and ambulation with a walker

Case 4: Cancer-Related Debility

  • Patient: 50-year-old female recovering from surgery and chemotherapy for breast cancer
  • PLOF: Independent with all activities
  • Current Status: Severe fatigue and deconditioning, requiring mod assist for transfers and dependent for ADLs
  • Rehab Goals: Improve endurance and progress to independence in ADLs

Case 5: Cardiac Surgery with Deconditioning

  • Patient: 75-year-old male recovering from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
  • PLOF: Ambulated independently with no assistive devices
  • Current Status: Severe deconditioning, requiring mod assist for ambulation and ADLs
  • Rehab Goals: Progress to supervision for ambulation and achieve independence in basic ADLs

Case 6: Severe Deconditioning Post-Hospitalization

  • Patient: 65-year-old female recovering from sepsis after a prolonged hospital stay
  • PLOF: Independent with all activities
  • Current Status: Max assist for transfers, non-ambulatory, and dependent for ADLs
  • Rehab Goals: Regain strength and progress to mod assist for transfers and ambulation

Case 7: Chronic Pain Syndrome

  • Patient: 55-year-old female with fibromyalgia and significant functional limitations due to chronic pain
  • PLOF: Independent with all activities
  • Current Status: Mod assist for ADLs and ambulation due to pain and stiffness
  • Rehab Goals: Improve pain management and progress to independence in ADLs

Case 8: Burns (Non-60% Rule)

  • Patient: 40-year-old male with second-degree burns covering 25% of his body
  • PLOF: Fully independent
  • Current Status: Dependent for ADLs due to pain and limited range of motion
  • Rehab Goals: Improve ROM and achieve independence in self-care tasks

Examples of Good vs. Poor Documentation for 40% Rule Patients

+

The following examples compare poor documentation with good documentation for patients under the 40% Rule. Each example highlights common weaknesses in poor documentation and demonstrates how to improve it to meet Medicare compliance standards.

Example 1: Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Poor Documentation:

"Patient is weak after COVID-19 hospitalization and needs therapy to get stronger."

Why It's Inadequate:
  • Vague and does not describe specific functional impairments
  • Lacks details about how the condition impacts the patient's ability to perform ADLs or mobility tasks
  • Fails to justify why the patient needs IRF-level care
Good Documentation:

"Patient presents with severe deconditioning following a prolonged ICU stay for COVID-19, including 20 days of intubation and mechanical ventilation.

PLOF: Patient was independent with all ADLs and ambulation without assistive devices prior to illness.

Current Functional Status: Requires max assist for transfers, dependent for dressing and bathing, and non-ambulatory. Patient experiences severe fatigue, shortness of breath with minimal exertion, and weakness in all extremities (4-/5 strength in upper extremities, 3/5 strength in lower extremities).

Medical Necessity: Patient requires an interdisciplinary approach to address deconditioning and functional impairments, including PT to improve lower extremity strength and ambulation, and OT for ADL retraining and energy conservation techniques. Close medical supervision is necessary to monitor oxygen levels and adjust treatment for persistent tachycardia and hypoxemia.

Rehabilitation Goals: Within 10 days, patient will progress to mod assist for transfers and ambulate 50 feet with a rolling walker. Within 14 days, patient will regain independence in grooming and dressing tasks with setup assistance."

Example 2: COPD with Deconditioning

Poor Documentation:

"Patient has COPD and has gotten weaker after hospitalization. Needs therapy to improve."

Why It's Inadequate:
  • Does not explain how COPD affects the patient's functional status or rehabilitation potential
  • Lacks specific details about ADLs, mobility, and medical needs
Good Documentation:

"Patient with a history of advanced COPD presents with severe deconditioning following a 10-day hospitalization for acute exacerbation requiring BiPAP and high-flow oxygen therapy.

PLOF: Patient was independent with all ADLs and ambulated household distances with a cane prior to exacerbation.

Current Functional Status: Requires mod assist for transfers, dependent for dressing and bathing, and unable to ambulate due to significant exertional dyspnea and weakness (3+/5 strength in lower extremities).

Medical Necessity: Patient requires an interdisciplinary approach with PT to improve endurance and ambulation, and OT to address ADL retraining and energy conservation strategies. Close physician oversight is needed to monitor oxygen saturation levels and manage inhalation therapies.

Rehabilitation Goals: Within 7 days, patient will progress to supervision for transfers and ambulate 25 feet with a walker. Within 14 days, the patient will demonstrate energy conservation techniques to perform ADLs with min assist."

Example 3: Cardiac Surgery with Deconditioning

Poor Documentation:

"Patient is weak after heart surgery and needs rehab."

Why It's Inadequate:
  • Too vague and does not explain the patient's functional impairments or rehabilitation needs
  • Does not justify why the patient requires IRF-level care versus home health or SNF
Good Documentation:

"Patient is recovering from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and presents with severe deconditioning and functional impairments.

PLOF: Independent with all ADLs and ambulation without assistive devices prior to surgery.

Current Functional Status: Requires mod assist for transfers, dependent for dressing and bathing, and ambulates 10 feet with max assist and a rolling walker. Patient experiences significant fatigue with minimal exertion and shortness of breath.

Medical Necessity: Patient requires intensive rehabilitation to regain strength and function, with PT to address ambulation and endurance deficits, and OT for ADL retraining and energy conservation techniques. Close physician oversight is needed to monitor cardiovascular status and adjust medications for hypertension.

Rehabilitation Goals: Within 10 days, patient will progress to supervision for transfers and ambulate 50 feet with a walker. Within 14 days, patient will demonstrate independence in grooming tasks with setup assistance."

The Importance of Thorough Pre-Screening for 40% Rule Patients

+

For patients who fall under the 40% Rule, a thorough pre-screen is even more critical than for 60% Rule patients. Since these diagnoses are not automatically qualifying, the burden of proof for medical necessity is higher.

Key Elements of a Thorough Pre-Screen for 40% Rule Patients

  1. Comprehensive Medical History

    Document the full medical history, including the primary diagnosis, comorbidities, and recent hospitalizations or procedures. Include specific dates, treatments, and complications.

  2. Detailed Functional Assessment

    Conduct a thorough assessment of the patient's current functional status, including specific assistance levels for transfers, ambulation, and ADLs. Use standardized measures when possible (e.g., FIM scores, strength measurements).

  3. Prior Level of Functioning

    Document the patient's functional status before the onset of the condition or recent decline. This establishes the baseline and rehabilitation potential.

  4. Medical Complexity

    Clearly describe the medical complexities that require physician oversight and cannot be managed in a lower level of care.

  5. Rehabilitation Potential

    Assess and document the patient's potential for functional improvement with intensive rehabilitation.

  6. Interdisciplinary Needs

    Specify which therapy disciplines are required and why their coordination is necessary for the patient's recovery.

Pre-Screen Interview Questions for 40% Rule Patients

Use these questions during your pre-screen interview to gather the necessary information:

  • What was the patient's functional status before their current condition? Were they independent, or did they use assistive devices?
  • What specific functional deficits is the patient currently experiencing? (Ask for details about transfers, ambulation, ADLs, etc.)
  • What medical complications or comorbidities does the patient have that require close physician monitoring?
  • Why would the patient not be appropriate for a skilled nursing facility or home health services?
  • Has the patient received therapy in another setting? If so, what were the outcomes and why was it insufficient?
  • What are the patient's specific rehabilitation goals and expected timeframe for achievement?
  • What therapy disciplines will be required to address the patient's needs?
  • What is the discharge plan for the patient after IRF care?

Key Takeaways for the 40% Rule

+
  1. The 40% Rule allows for flexibility in admitting patients with non-qualifying diagnoses, provided their medical necessity and rehabilitation needs are clearly documented.
  2. Strong documentation must emphasize the complexity of the patient's condition and the need for IRF-level care.
  3. Use detailed descriptions of functional deficits, interdisciplinary care, and measurable goals to justify admission.
  4. Medicare auditors will closely review these cases, so thorough and precise documentation is critical to avoid claim denials.
  5. A comprehensive pre-screen is essential for identifying appropriate patients and documenting their needs accurately.
  6. Always include specific assistance levels, measurable deficits, and clear justification for why a lower level of care is not appropriate.
  7. Document the need for physician oversight and interdisciplinary care in detail.
  8. Use case studies and examples of good documentation as templates for your own documentation.